Estate Valuation Freezing and Discounting

        If you expect at your death to have more than the $2,000,000 estate tax exemption amount, less taxable gifts made during your life, and it is unlikely that you will be able to lower the amount using tax exemption vehicles, you will likely need to utilize estate valuation freezing and discounting tools to reduce your tax exposure. The following is a discussion of some of the more commonly used methods.

Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)

Buttercup.jpg (2786 bytes)        A GRAT is a trust into which a donor transfers assets and retains an interest in the form of periodic payments (i.e., a retained annuity) for a specified term. At the end of the term the assets of the trust belong to the beneficiaries. The present value of the trust assets at the end of the term (the beneficiaries' remainder interest) is a taxable gift of the donor to the trust beneficiaries when the trust is set up. This value is a function of the length of the term, the value of the assets, and the grantor's life expectancy.
        The grantor's life expectancy figures in the equation because if the grantor fails to survive the term the assets do not pass to the beneficiaries. Instead, the trust vehicle is undone as though it was never set up and the grantor's unified credit is recredited for the unsatisfied remainder interest gift.
        The longer the term of the trust the more likely it is that the grantor will not survive the term. Therefore, to transfer assets at a low unified credit cost you can specify a term that is longer than the grantor's life expectancy. If the grantor is likely to live longer than actuarial tables would suggest this may be a particularly advantageous way of reducing transfer tax exposure.
        Another factor affecting the usefulness of a GRAT is the expected appreciation of the assets subject to the GRAT. If the assets outperform the market then the GRAT will reduce your unified credit cost proportionally.

The Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT)

        The QPRT allows transferring a residence to children at a lower unified credit cost. This is accomplished through the use of a trust into which the residence is transferred, with the house going to the children after the trust term. The value of the grantor's term interest is subtracted from the appraised value of the property to arrive at the unified credit cost of the transfer. The following example illustrates the unified credit cost of varying trust terms and ages of the grantor at the time the QPRT is set up based on current interest rates:

Grantor's Age Trust
Term
Factor House Value   Unified
   Credit
    Cost
50   3 .838 $1,000,000 $838,000
50 10 .541 $1,000,000 $541,000
60   3 .816 $1,000,000 $816,000
60 10 .482 $1,000,000 $482,000
70   3 .772 $1,000,000 $772,000
70 10 .374 $1,000,000 $374,000
80   3 .674 $1.000,000 $674,000
80 10 .194 $1,000,000 $194,000

        Thus, the older the grantor and the longer the trust term the lower the unified credit cost. During the term of the trust the grantor acts in every way like the owner of the home, and may sell the home, purchase a new home or invest the sale proceeds in an annuity for his benefit. For a particularly healthy grantor (expected to live longer than actuarial tables would indicate) the QPRT may be an even more advantageous tax saving vehicle.
        There are two potential problems with using a QPRT. First, the grantor must pay rent to the children at the end of the trust term. However, this could be an advantage in that it gives the grantor an opportunity to transfer an additional part of his estate tax free to children.
        The other problem is the house does not get the stepped up basis it would get if it had passed at death from the grantor's estate. If, however, the children keep the house in the family and pass their interests at death the house would at that time get a stepped up basis.
        If the grantor does not survive the trust term the house is put back in his estate and his unified credit shelter is restored to what it would have been if the QPRT had never been established - thus, simply put, the trust vehicle is undone. To avoid this uncertainty various tactics can be used, including using multiple QPRTs (with varying terms) and hedging with various insurance vehicles.

The Personal Residence Life Estate Trust (PRLET)

        This vehicle is similar to a QPRT except the grantor retains a life interest in the home (instead of a term interest) and the remainder interest is sold to the children for the appraised value of the remainder interest (which can be paid on an installment basis). Thus, unlike a QPRT the grantor can remain in the home for life and never has to pay rent.
        The PRLET may be better where the grantor's resources are more limited and it would be desirable for him to receive additional income during life. The grantor must get a qualified appraisal to insure the exchange is for full and adequate consideration, otherwise the entire property value could be included in his estate for estate tax purposes.

Asset Installment Sale

        By selling an asset to family members on an installment basis, subsequent appreciation of the asset's value is shifted to the family members and removed from the seller's estate. This works only if the purchase price is for full and adequate consideration and is sufficiently documented to create a legally binding obligation. Upon the death of the note holder, the unpaid balance is included in his taxable estate. The asset that was sold is not included, including post-sale appreciation of its value. The installment note can be secured by the underlying property.

Self Canceling Installment Note

        Another version of the asset installment sale employs the use of a promissory note that, by its terms, expires upon the death of the payee. In addition to its appreciation shifting feature the self canceling installment note is reduced to zero at death. There is therefore no transfer tax cost to the note holder. The purchase price, however, must reflect full and adequate consideration - which in this case means the note must be sold at a premium to compensate for the self canceling feature. The amount of premium would have to be documented by a valuation expert.

Family Partnerships and Closely Held Businesses

        An individual who owns a majority interest in a closely held corporation or similar enterprise may reduce his or her estate tax liability by a gift of sufficient shares to reduce the donor's holdings below 50% of the total voting power. This is because the Tax Court recognizes minority interests to be worth substantially less than their pro rata portion of the entire entity, due to the lack of marketability and control features of minority interests. QTIP or other irrevocable trusts can be set up to receive transfers of minority interests from the entity owner in order to achieve entity (and hence, estate) valuation discounts.
        The formation of a family partnership or corporation is another estate-valuation-discount planning vehicle sometimes used by persons with over $2,000,000 in assets who wish to transfer property to younger generation family members at reduced transfer tax costs. It involves setting up one or more corporate or partnership organizations in which asset and control features are differentially distributed to younger generation family members over time.
        In the beginning the parents own and control. Later they may own less as a result of transferring shares to children while retaining control, at least initially. Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Corporations are the preferred forms of business organization because corporate shares do not receive a step-up in basis for appreciation of the underlying assets when the shares are transferred at death. The operating entity is preferably comprised of an ongoing business rather than merely security investments.
        The result is that lifetime gifts, including annual exclusion gifts, and the balance of the parents' interests at death, may be discounted for tax purposes because of the lack of liquidity and control inherent in shares of closely held business organizations. Such interests are typically appraised at 35% to 45% of the value of the underlying assets. (If you want family partnership interests to qualify as annual exclusion gifts interest transferability and general partner income distribution discretion provisions need to be drafted carefully).
        Another effect may include increased protection from creditor claims. To the extent family assets consist of shares or interests in family partnerships creditors may only be able to attach future distributions of income. Such distributions are subject to considerable control and discretion of the family members possessing the control features of the organization.
        Additional advantages include the spreading out of income among family members (thus potentially lowering overall income tax rates), less exposure to divorced spousal claims (shares of family organization are not easily commingled with marital assets), and facilitation of annual exclusion giving (no need to divide up assets - shares of family organization gifted instead).
        In the case of a preexisting family owned corporation valuation discounts and control flexibility can be achieved through recapitalization. The articles of incorporation may be amended creating a nonvoting class of common stock, which is distributed to current owners by stock dividend. Thereafter nonvoting and voting shares are distributed to younger family members as desired. Over time the control features of the organization can be held among several family members thereby achieving minority and liquidity valuation discounts.

Where would you like to go now?

The FamilyEstate Index page
The FamilyEstate Wills and Living Trusts
The FamilyEstate Powers of Attorney
The FamilyEstate main entrance (if the contents frame is missing at left)